Abdulaziz/Askew v. Williams et al
| Mu'min Abdulaziz/Askew |
| Doe, Palmer, Huddleson, Christopher Budnik, Brodrick, Nance, James Young, Cory Williams, John Maples, Richard Guy, Babbs, Gatlin and Parker |
| 1:2012cv00102 |
| October 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
JUDGMENT re 74 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/13/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER directing the Clerk to change the style of the case to reflect the correct names of the defendants set forth in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/29/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/16/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING in full 9 Partial Report and Recommendations. The request for a ruling embedded in pltf's 19 Motion for Ruling is granted. The Court has confirmed de novo that plaintiff is a three-striker. Two of the three dismissal orders are attached to this Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/22/13. (Attachments: # 1 Document PB:93-cv-522 R&R, # 2 Document LR:93-cv-831 R&R)(kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
