Morris v. Nettles et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 29, 2016
JUDGMENT dismissing Morris's claims against the Grimes Unit with prejudice; dismissing Morris's First Amendment and Equal Protection claims without prejudice; dismissing Morris's claims against Dowell without prejudice; and dismissing Morris's Eighth Amendment claim against Nettles with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 07/29/2016. (rhm)
|October 26, 2015
ORDER adopting 23 unopposed recommendation. Dowell's motion for summary judgment, 17 , is granted. Moriss's claims against her are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/26/2015. (jak)
|June 12, 2015
ORDER adopting the partial recommendation, 8 , as modified and overruling Morris's objection, 9 . The case will proceed with Morris's cruel and unusual punishment claim against Nettles and Dowell. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summon s for Nettles and Dowell, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, complaint, and this Order on them through the ADC Compliance Office without prepayment of fees and costs or security. Morris's claims against the Grimes Correction Unit are dismissed with prejudice. To the extend Morris asserts a First Amendment and Equal Protection claim, those claims are dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/11/2015. (jak)
|January 29, 2015
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 01/29/2015. (kcs)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?