Jarrett v. Hearyman et al
| Terrance Jarrett |
| Marty Hearyman, Sharyn Lee Rohder, Hayden and Brink |
| 1:2015cv00059 |
| May 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Izard |
| Beth Deere |
| James M. Moody |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Mr.Jarrett's claims against Defendants Rohder, Haydon, and Brink are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on the failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Mr. Jarrett's claims a gainst Defendant Hearyman are limited to Defendant Hearyman's failure to provide orthopedic shoes in February of 2015.The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Defendants Rohder, Haydon, and Brink as Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/7/2015. (ks)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summonses for each of the named Defendants. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint, with any attachments, and a summons for these Defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security. The Motion, 3 , is denied at this time. Mr. Jarrett may file another motion to correct if necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 5/12/2015. (jak)(Docket text modified on 5/12/2015 to correct the Judge who signed the Order). (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
