Locke v. Williams et al
Tyrone Eugene Locke |
Marty W Hearyman, Sharon Rhoder, Hull and R Gillihan |
1:2018cv00021 |
March 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Batesville Office |
Izard |
Beth Deere |
D. P. Marshall |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 JUDGMENT: Locke's claims against Gillihan and against the Arkansas Department of Correction are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/18/2018. (jak) |
Filing 52 ORDER adopting 45 partial recommendation and overruling 49 objections. 15 Motion for summary judgment denied. 9 , 21 , & 36 Motions to dismiss are granted. Locke's claims against Hearyman, Rhoder, and Hull are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/27/2018. (jak) |
Filing 11 ORDER adopting 3 Recommendation and overruling 6 Partial Objections. If Locke wants to allege additional facts against Williams, then he must do so in a motion to amend his complaint, not in his objections to the recommendation. Locke's claims against Williams, Johnson, and Day are dismissed without prejudice. His claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/17/2018. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.