Hill v. Reed et al
| Adam Hill |
| Dexter Payne, Lay, Hancock, Wendy Kelley, Brooks, Dale Reed, Sheperd, Michelle Gray, Mayo, J Gillum, Edwards, G Thompson, Holcomb, Jones and Owney |
| 1:2018cv00089 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for order #26 . Placement of inmates is at the discretion of the Arkansas Department of Correction. Plaintiff's motion to add grievance is denied #27 . Should Defendants seek dismissal based on exhaustion, Plaintiff may submit this grievance as a part of his response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/10/2019. (lej)
|
| Filing 27 MOTION to add Grievance to Case by Adam Hill. (kdr) |
| Filing 26 MOTION for Assistance from the Court by Adam Hill. (kdr) |
|
Filing 25
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for order #23 . The relief Plaintiff requests is a new request unrelated to his Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/9/2019. (lej)
|
|
Filing 24
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint #22 . Plaintiff was previously notified that the Court will only consider claims properly pled in a complaint or in a superseding amended complaint. The Court will not consider claims stated in notices or other pleadings that fail to comply with the F.R.C.P. (Doc. No. 3 at 2.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/9/2019. (lej)
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #23 Motion. CORRECTION: The docket entry was modified to correct the filing event as "MOTION FOR ORDER" pursuant to instruction from Chambers. (jak) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Order by Adam Hill. (ljb) (Docket text modified on 1/9/2019 to correct the filing event pursuant to instruction from Chambers) (jak) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint by Adam Hill. (llg) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety #13 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's claims against Defendants Hancock, Mayo, Gillum, Thompson, Holcomb, Owney, Jones, and Edwards; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/7/2019. (ljb)
|
| Filing 20 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Adam Hill. (DOCKETED pursuant to #19 Order.) (ljb) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint #18 . The Clerk is directed to file Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. The Clerk shall prepare summons and the USM shall serve Defendants Reed, Lay, Gray, Brooks, Sheperd, Kelley, and Payne without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Plaintiff's motion for clarification is granted #17 . The Clerk is directed to refrain from docketing any future documents from Plaintiff that are not attached to a motion or response thereto. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/3/2019. (lej)
|
| Summons Reissued as to Brooks, Michelle Gray, Wendy Kelley, Lay, Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Sheperd and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (ljb) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Adam Hill. (kdr) |
| Filing 16 EVIDENCE by Adam Hill. (kdr) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Clarification by Adam Hill. (ljb) |
| Filing 15 EVIDENCE filed by Adam Hill. (ljb) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion to correct spelling is denied as moot because Defendant Sheperd's name is already spelled on the docket sheet in the manner he requests #12 . For clarification purposes, the Clerk is directed to change the name of Do. No. 9 to Plaintiff's "Second Amended Complaint." The Clerk shall prepare summons and the USM shall serve Defendants Reed, Lay, Gray, Brooks, Sheperd, Kelley, and Payne without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/18/2018. (lej)
|
|
Filing 13
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Hancock, Mayo, Gillum, Thompson, Holcomb, Owney, Jones, and Edwards be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order adopting this recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/18/2018. (lej)
|
| Summons Issued as to Brooks, Michelle Gray, Wendy Kelley, Lay, Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Sheperd and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (ljb) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Correct Spelling. (kdr) |
| Filing 11 ADDENDUM filed by Adam Hill to #9 Amended Complaint. (kdr) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #9 Amended Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office (wrong image file). The correct document was added to docket entry #9 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
| Filing 9 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Adam Hill.(kdr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/17/2018: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).(Docket text modified on 12/18/2018 to correct the description of the document filed pursuant to #14 Order) (jak) |
| Filing 8 ADDENDUM to #2 Complaint filed by Adam Hill. (kdr) |
| Filing 7 ADDENDUM to #2 Complaint filed by Adam Hill. (kdr) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel #4 . A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered Plaintiff's need for an attorney, the likelihood that Plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the Plaintiff's ability to investigate and present his case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that Plaintiff's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears he is capable of prosecuting his claims without appointed counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/7/2018. (lej)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Adam Hill.(kdr) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Adam Hill. (kdr) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit #1 . If Plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file it within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's complaint, as it now stands, is deficient, and may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this order. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/28/2018. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Adam Hill. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam Hill. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
