Nguyen v. Outlaw
Plaintiff: Drakenold Tuan Nguyen
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Case Number: 2:2008cv00217
Filed: December 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: St. Francis
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Ray
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT : Consistent with the 13 Memorandum and Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent, and this habeas action is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/20/09. (hph)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nguyen v. Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Drakenold Tuan Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?