Bennett v. Outlaw
Plaintiff: Corey A Bennett
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Case Number: 2:2009cv00053
Filed: May 18, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Helena Office
County: St. Francis
Presiding Judge: Joe J. Volpe
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that Petitioner does not have a protected liberty interest in admission to the RDAP (Residential Drug Abuse Program) in order to establish a due process violation and that Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/13/2009. (jas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett v. Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corey A Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?