Keith v. Outlaw

Plaintiff: Michael Keith
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Case Number: 2:2010cv00113
Filed: August 12, 2010
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Helena Office
County: St. Francis
Referring Judge: Beth Deere
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 24, 2010 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 9 Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Recommended Disposition; and dismissing 2 Keith's petition for a writ of habeas corpus with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/24/10. (hph)
October 18, 2010 9 Opinion or Order of the Court RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that the District Court dismiss Michael Keith's 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in its entirety, with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/18/2010. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith v. Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Keith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?