Parker v. Beebe et al
| Ronald E Parker |
| Eaten, Moses Jackson, III, C S Murphy, Norman, Valeree Westbrook, F Bell, Williams, Foreman, Wright, Hallaway, N Scales, Akkins, Mike Beebe, Ray Hobbs, Todd Ball, C Wright, Walis, Larry D May, K Doyal and Hawkins |
| 2:2011cv00022 |
| January 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Beth Deere |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING 60 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, deft's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Mr. Parker's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/31/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER adopting 23 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; therefore, pltf's claims against defts Beebe, Hobbs, May, Ball, Westbrook, Foreman, Akins (identified as Akkins), Eaten, Murphy, Hollaway, Norman, Bell, Williams, Scales, T. Wright, Doyal, Wallace (identified as Walis), C. Wright, and Hawkins are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 5/2/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER adopting 9 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, Ronald Parker's 5 Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/25/11. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
