Hathaway v. Outlaw

Plaintiff: Hillard Hathaway
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Case Number: 2:2011cv00168
Filed: September 22, 2011
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Helena Office
County: St. Francis
Referring Judge: Beth Deere
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 14, 2012 14 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Respondent T.C. Outlaw. Mr. Hathaway's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed, with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 3/14/12. (hph) (Modified on 3/14/2012 to correct typographical error).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hathaway v. Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T C Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hillard Hathaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?