Dewberry v. Ford et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 28, 2017
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 71 Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed. All relief sought is denied and the case is closed. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/28/2017. (mef)
|March 2, 2016
ORDER approving 40 motion for extension of time and considers as timely filed Mr. Dewberry's 40 42 objections; approving and adopting in its entirety 37 Recommended Partial Disposition; and granting defendants' 27 motion for parti al summary judgment. The Court dismisses with prejudice all claims raised against defendants in their official capacities. The Court dismisses without prejudice the claims against Officer Thorne, Sgt. Williams, Sgt. Scott, Warden Burl, and Sgt. Wes tbrook in their individual capacities. Mr. Dewberry may proceed with his failure to protect claims against Capt. Ford and Lt. Munn in their individual capacities only. This Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 03/02/2016. (rhm)
|August 20, 2015
ORDER approving and adopting 35 Recommended Partial Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects and dismissing without prejudice defendant Ricky Thorne from this case. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 08/20/2015. (rhm)
|November 26, 2014
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/26/2014. (kcs)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?