Nelson v. Rivera et al
| Randy Scott Nelson |
| Michelle Wingo, Sheila Woodard, Carlos Rivera, Frank Gotreaux and Martin Tindel |
| 2:2019cv00059 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| James M Moody |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and referring this case to United States Magistrate Judge Jerome Kearney for consideration and recommended disposition. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/6/2019. (ljb)
|
| Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #3 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge James M. Moody Jr. and Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. (jak) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to reassign this case to the Honorable James M. Moody, Jr. and the Honorable Jerome Kearney. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/30/2019. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Randy Scott Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Randy Scott Nelson. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
