Dillard v. Inmate Services Corporation et al
David Dillard |
Inmate Services Corporation and Randy Cagle, Jr |
2:2019cv00150 |
November 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 3/24/2020; Rule 26(f) Report due by 4/7/2020; Bench Trial set for sometime during the week of 11/30/2020 at 09:00 AM in Helena Courtroom # 314 before Judge Kristine G. Baker. Signed at the direction of the Court on 01/24/2020. (tmw) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Randy Cagle, Jr, Inmate Services Corporation.(Webster, Ross) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 motion for extension of time to respond or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint. Defendants' deadline to respond or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint is on or before 1/9/2020. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/27/2019. (jbh) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants (Webster, Ross) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ross Emerson Webster on behalf of All Defendants (Webster, Ross) |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David Dillard. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT074966.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.