Bush v. USA
| Bush and Gabriel Bush |
| USA |
| 2:2020cv00054 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Beth Deere |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 motion to dismiss criminal charges that might be filed; and directing Mr. Bush to notify the Court within 30 days whether he intends to pursue civil rights claims at this time, after considering whether he has fully exhausted his administrative remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 4/17/2020. (jbh)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Gabriel Bush. (ljb) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk to enclose an application to proceed IFP and a jail account information sheet along with a copy of this order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $400.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 3/27/2020. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE filed by Gabriel Bush. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against USA filed by Gabriel Bush. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
