Terry v. Parker et al
| Jarell D Terry |
| Tessane S Parker, Gaylon Lay, Janice Blake, Raymond Naylor, K Randle and Dexter Payne |
| 2:2021cv00148 |
| November 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #3 Initial Order for Pro SE Prisoners. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (incorrect signature date). The correct document was added to docket entry #3 and is attached hereto for service on the parties. (jak) |
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; directing monthly payments be collected from Plaintiff's prison trust account until the $350 filing fee has been paid; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the EARU and appropriate ADC offices. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 12/16/2021. (kdr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/20/2021: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Jarell D Terry.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jarell D Terry. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
