Eckles v. Yates
| Houston Taylor Eckles |
| USA, Doe and John P Yates |
| 2:2022cv00189 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| Brian S Miller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #5 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/17/2022. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER adopting #4 recommended disposition; and dismissing without prejudice #1 Eckles' petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/17/2022. (kdr)
|
| Filing 4 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed without prejudice; and directing the Clerk of the Court to change Respondents to John P. Yates, Warden, FCI Forrest City, Arkansas. Objections due within 14 days of the entry of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 10/24/2022. (ldb) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number LIT088767. (kth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing of Request for Withdrawal of Inmate's Personal Funds by Houston Taylor Eckles. (kdr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Houston Taylor Eckles.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
