Hoskins v. Yates
| Walter Hoskins |
| John P Yates and E Kessel |
| 2:2023cv00090 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| Brian S Miller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Respondent E. Kessel's request for additional time in which to respond to Hoskins' petition; directing Kessel to file his response on or before 06/09/2023; and directing the Clerk to change the respondent's name accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 05/22/2023. (llg)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Extend Time by John P Yates (Pence, Richard) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this Order on the respondent and the U.S. Attorney by regular mail; and directing Respondent to file an answer, motion or other response to the petition, in conformity with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts, within 21 days after service of this petition, exclusive of the day of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 05/01/2023. (llg)
|
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number LIT1861. (kth) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Walter Hoskins.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
