Siller v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Ronda Siller
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2007cv00138
Filed: October 1, 2007
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Referring Judge: Beth Deere
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 17, 2009 14 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT, pursuant to 13 Memorandum Opinion And Order entered this date, the Commissioner's decision is affirmed & Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 3/17/09. (jct) (copy forwarded to ALJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siller v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronda Siller
Represented By: Anthony W. Bartels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Stacey Elise McCord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?