Harris v. Bilco Company
| Nelson Harris |
| Bilco Company |
| 3:2007cv00156 |
| October 25, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Crittenden |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to settlement. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/5/09. (jct)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 34 Defendant's Motion in Limine. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/30/09. (jct)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER authorizing Ellen Owens Smith & Khayyam M. Eddings, counsel for defendant, to bring electronic devices into the Courthouse in Jonesboro, Arkansas, between 5/4/09 & 5/6/09, subject to the rules specified. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/29/09. (jct)
|
|
Filing
44
AMENDED ORDER directing counsel to report to Courtroom #324 in Jonesboro, Arkansas, by 8:30 a.m. on Monday May 4, 2009 to begin trial of this matter as previously scheduled in 42 Order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/24/09. (mkf) Modified on 4/24/2009 to add the word "Amended" to the Order text. (mkf)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 41 Joint MOTION to Continue Trial. The trial of this case will begin sometime the week of 5/4/09 at the U.S. Courthouse in Jonesboro. All deadlines have passed, so a new scheduling order will not be issued, except the parties are directed to comply with paragraph 8 of the current scheduling order on or before 4/27/09. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/4/09. (jct)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 37 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 34 Defendant's MOTION in Limine. The deadline is extended up to & including 2/3/09. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/3/09. (jct)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION AND ORDER denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/3/08. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 22 Joint MOTION to Continue. The trial of this matter previously set for 9/22/08 is removed from the Court's docket. A new trial date & scheduling deadlines will be set by separate order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/12/08. (jct)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff's response deadline to 13 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment is hereby extended up to & including 9/11/08. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/8/08. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. Bilco Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nelson Harris | |
| Represented By: | James Edward Patrick, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bilco Company | |
| Represented By: | Ellen Owens Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
