Gray v. Mills et al

Case Number: 3:2007cv00188
Filed: December 7, 2007
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Jonesboro Office
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Referring Judge: J. Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 1, 2008 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 of U.S. Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. Plaintiff shall proceed with his inadequate medical care claims against Defts Cox & Houchin, & his freedom of religion claim against Defendant Arnold. Pur suant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A, all remaining claims & Defendants are dismissed, with prejudice, because Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Defendants Chris Holt and Larry Mills are terminated. The Clerk is directed to prepare summons for Defendants Arnold, Cox & Houchin, & the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve said Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/1/08. (jct)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. Mills et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?