Stewart v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Donna Stewart
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2009cv00039
Filed: March 25, 2009
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Clay
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Referring Judge: Beth Deere
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:427 Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 6, 2009 15 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT re 14 Memorandum Opinion and Order in favor of Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, and against Plaintiff, Donna Stewart. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/6/09. (bkp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donna Stewart
Represented By: Anthony W. Bartels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Stacey Elise McCord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?