Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company et al
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London |
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, Greene County Abstract & Title Company LLC, Mary Williams, Blake Williams, Blamar Investments LLC, Williams Irrigation Services LLC and Precision Title Services LLC |
3:2010cv00109 |
May 18, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Out of State |
Brian S. Miller |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 JUDGMENT ON DEFAULT in favor of Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London against Blamar Investments LLC, Greene County Abstract & Title Company LLC, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, Precision Title Services LLC, Williams Irrigation Services LLC, Blake Williams, Mary Williams. Plaintiffs' 12 MOTION for Default Judgment is granted. Plaintiffs do not have a duty to defend or indemnify any of the defendants in USDC, E/D of AR, Jonesboro Division, Case No. 3:09CV00102, Old Republic v. Greene, et al, or any other lawsuit filed in connection with the incident alleged. Plaintiffs are under no obligation to satisfy any judgment entered against any defendant in 3:09CV00102, or any other lawsuit filed in connection with the incidents alleged herein. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/14/2010. (jct) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.