Swiney v. Boyd et al
| Travis W Swiney |
| Marty Boyd and Joe Bobo |
| 3:2013cv00116 |
| May 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Craighead |
| Beth Deere |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
JUDGMENT pursuant to 14 Order, Swiney's 1 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/4/2013. (jak)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER directing Plaintiff to the fact that he has a duty to keep a current address on file with the Court. If by August 30, 2013, Swiney has not updated his address, the Court will dismiss his complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/6/2013. (jak)
|
|
Filing
7
JUDGMENT consistent with 6 Order, Swiney's 1 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 06/28/2013. (jak)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER re 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Travis W Swiney. If Mr. Swiney wishes to go forward with this case, he must file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay a $400.00 filing fee within thirty days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward Mr. Swiney an in forma pauperis application, along with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 05/24/2013. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
