Hawkins et al v. Bank of America NA
Sheila Hawkins and Tony Hawkins |
Bank of America NA |
3:2013cv00210 |
September 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Mississippi |
D. P. Marshall |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 JUDGMENT dismissing with prejudice the Hawkinses' complaint. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/2/2014. (jak) |
Filing 30 ORDER directing Defendant Bank of America to file an answer by 7 March 2014. A final scheduling order will issue. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/20/2014. (jak) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend; denying without prejudice 18 Motion to file an amended class-action complaint. The Court will withhold entry of Judgment. Plaintiffs may file another proposed amended complaint that atte mpts to satisfy Rule 9 on their ADTPA claim, and that omits class allegations, by 7 February 2014. If no such proposed pleading is filed, or if one is filed that does not pass muster, then the Court will enter judgment dismissing the case without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/22/2014. (jak) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying without prejudice 5 Motion to Dismiss. The original service is quashed. The Court will see if the Hawkinses' prompt efforts to correct the acknowledged deficiencies in the summons and service of process succeed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/16/2013. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.