Hampton v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
| Herman Williett Hampton |
| Marty Boyd, Craighead County Detention Center, Brett Duncan and Bently |
| 3:2014cv00141 |
| June 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Craighead |
| Beth Deere |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT consistent with 31 Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is hereby dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/9/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER adopting 12 Partial Recommended Disposition. Herman Willett Hampton's claims against the Craighead County Detention Center are dismissed with prejudice. In addition, his claims relating to the Detention Center's grievance procedure and the defendants' failure to respond to his grievances are also dismissed, with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/3/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare summonses for Defendants Boyd, Duncan, and Bently. The United States Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint, amended complaint, and second amended complaint, with any attachments and a summons for each Defendant through the Craighead County Sheriff's Department without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/4/2014. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
