Moore v. Poinsett County, Arkansas

Moore v. Poinsett County, Arkansas

Plaintiff:	Eric Moore
Defendant:	Poinsett County, Arkansas
Case Number:	3:2015cv00063
Filed:	March 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Jonesboro Office
County:	Poinsett
Presiding Judge:	D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 22, 2016	Filing 36 JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/22/2016. (jak)
April 14, 2016	Filing 21 ORDER denying 10 Motion for summary judgment. The Court requests that Moore consider whether to dismiss the state law claim without prejudice and to advise in the pretrial disclosure sheet. This case is first out for bench trial in Jonesboro, 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, 7 June 2016. The Amended Final Scheduling Order, 8 , is further amended. No trial briefs or responding trial briefs are needed. The parties' summary judgment briefs will do just fine. No proposed findings and conclusions are ne eded; instead, the Court encourages the parties to collaborate on and file a stipulation about undisputed backgrounds facts. Any stipulation is due 6 May 2016. Copy of exhibits due to chambers by 1 June 2016. Original exhibits to be delivered to the courtroom deputy on June 7. Lastly, the Court sees no need for a pretrial. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/14/2016. (jak)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 22, 2016

Filing 36 JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/22/2016. (jak)

April 14, 2016

Filing 21 ORDER denying 10 Motion for summary judgment. The Court requests that Moore consider whether to dismiss the state law claim without prejudice and to advise in the pretrial disclosure sheet. This case is first out for bench trial in Jonesboro, 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, 7 June 2016. The Amended Final Scheduling Order, 8 , is further amended. No trial briefs or responding trial briefs are needed. The parties' summary judgment briefs will do just fine. No proposed findings and conclusions are ne eded; instead, the Court encourages the parties to collaborate on and file a stipulation about undisputed backgrounds facts. Any stipulation is due 6 May 2016. Copy of exhibits due to chambers by 1 June 2016. Original exhibits to be delivered to the courtroom deputy on June 7. Lastly, the Court sees no need for a pretrial. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/14/2016. (jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Poinsett County, Arkansas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Moore
Represented By:	Christopher Wesley Burks
Represented By:	Joshua Sanford
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Poinsett County, Arkansas
Represented By:	C. Burt Newell
Represented By:	Ralph C. Ohm
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?