Trammel v. Townes et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 11, 2016
JUDGMENT: Trammel's claims against Johnson and Towne are dismissed without prejudice. Trammel's claims against the Northeast Arkansas Community Corrections Center are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/11/2016. (thd)
|January 4, 2016
ORDER directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff a free world application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must file, on or before February 3, 2016, a statement indicating whether he wishes to continue with this lawsuit and a free world application to proceed in forma pauperis. If he does not timely and properly do so, this case will be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5 (c)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 1/4/2016. (jak)
|August 31, 2015
ORDER directing the Clerk to file a copy of Trammel's initial complaint, 2 , as an exhibit to his amended complaint, 5 , so the two can be read together going forward. Trammel's claims against former warden Johnson are dismissed without p rejudice. All claims against the Northeast Arkansas Community Correction are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to prepare and issue a summons for Defendant Townes. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint, amended complaint, and this Order on Townes without prepayment of fees and costs. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/31/2015. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?