Chisem v. Coleman et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 29, 2016
JUDGMENT: Chisem's claims against Childress and Dickerson for inadequate medical treatment are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/29/2016. (jak)
|July 11, 2016
ORDER: Embedded motion for copies, 29 , granted. The Court directs the Clerk to mail Chisem copies of docket entries 26 - 30 with a copy of this Order. Chisem's objections to the pending recommendation, 30 , due by 7/22/2016. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/11/2016. (jak)
|September 28, 2015
ORDER adopting 6 Recommendation. Chisem may proceed with his claim that Childress and Dickerson gave him inadequate medical treatment for his arm, rib, and shoulder injuries. Chisem's other claims against Childress and Dickerson are dismissed without prejudice because those claims are improperly joined in this lawsuit. Chisem's claims against Coleman and Allen are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/26/2015. (ks)
|August 20, 2015
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for Defendants Mandy Childress and Marni Dickerson and the U.S. Marshal shall serve a copy of the summons, amended complaint, and this Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Service for both Defendants should be through the Crittenden County Jail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/20/2015. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?