Hale v. Empire Express Inc et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 21, 2017
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion with directions on defense experts. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/21/2017. (jak)
|June 7, 2017
ORDER granting as modified 74 Joint Motion. On agreement of the parties, the Court strikes these parts of the 33 amended complaint: Paragraphs 23, 24 & 25; and all references to 49 C.F.R. § 391.41(b)(12)(i). Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/7/2017. (jak)
|March 4, 2017
ORDER granting as modified 23 Motion to Amend. Clean copy of the revised amended complaint due by 3/8/2017. Defendants' 22 Motion to Amend their answers is denied as moot. Answer or Rule 12 motion in response to the amended complaint due by 3/22/2017. 30 Motion granted. A Second Amended Final Scheduling Order will issue. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/4/2017. (jak)
|December 13, 2016
ORDER: 18 Joint report of discovery dispute noted. Defendants are entitled to the requested medical records because they're almost certain to contain relevant information about Robert Hale's injuries. The privilege has been waived by sui t; and the statutory protections are addressed by entry of this order. Last, as defendants say, the collateral source rule has exceptions, plus it governs only admissibility, not discoverability. Plaintiff (or the providers) must provide the records by 23 December 2016. If they come from the providers, defendants must provide plaintiff a copy. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/13/2016. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?