Johnson v. Crittenden County Detention Center et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 7, 2017
JUDGMENT consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is hereby dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/7/2017. (jak)
|June 27, 2017
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Defendant Childress; and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve her with copies of the 1 Complaint, 22 supplement to complaint, and 38 Amended Complaint with any attachments, and a summons without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/27/2017. (jak)
|June 20, 2017
ORDER granting 27 Motion. In his Amended Complaint, Mr. Johnson clarifies the claims made in his original complaint. The Clerk is instructed to terminate Defendants Cody and Allen as party Defendants. The Court cannot rule on 40 Motion without fi rst reviewing the proposed interrogatories. Mr. Johnson has 14 days to supplement his motion with the proposed interrogatories. Defendants will have 14 days from the date the supplement is filed to respond to Mr. Johnson's motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/20/2017. (jak)
|April 12, 2017
ORDER granting the parties additional time to complete discovery up to 7/14/2017. Mr. Johnson's response to the Defendants' pending 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is due on or before 7/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 4/12/2017. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?