Alston v. Swift
| James Alston |
| Gary Swift, Arkansas Department of Community Correction and Charlene Davidson Henrey |
| 3:2017cv00064 |
| April 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Craighead |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER: Alston hasn't paid the $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees or filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal; and the time to do so has passed, No. 18 . To the extent Alston's notice also sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, No. 17 , that motion is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/24/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 16 Motion for order. The Court directs the Clerk to resend Alston copies of docket entries No. 13 , 14 , 17 , & 18 with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/5/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT: Alston's complaint and amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/16/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: Alston hasn't paid the $400 filing and administrative fees or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. He must do one or the other by 5/8/2017. The Court directs the Clerk to mail Alston an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/7/2017. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
