Aldridge v. Bernet et al
| Christopher Aldridge |
| Mason, Bernet, Black and Balard |
| 3:2019cv00178 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Beth Deere |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Christopher Aldridge re #3 Order directing Mr. Aldridge to file an amended complaint, #4 Initial Order for Pro Se Prisoner-Plaintiffs. (fjg) |
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, the ADC Compliance Division, and the Warden of the Craighead County Detention Facility. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/17/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing Mr. Aldridge to file an amended complaint within 30 days. His failure to file an amended complaint could result in the dismissal of some or all claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/17/2019. (jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Christopher Aldridge. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Aldridge. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
