Dobbins v. Bowers et al
| Billy Dobbins |
| Phillip Sterling, Austin McFarland, Ty Fraiser and Bowers |
| 3:2019cv00298 |
| October 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| James M Moody |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT pursuant to #3 Order, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/5/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER finding that this action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to respond to the Court's orders. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/5/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS. The Clerk of Court is directed to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff must return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying calculation sheet and certificate signed by an authorized official, or pay the $400.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 10/31/2019. (jak)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Billy Dobbins.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
