Lewis v. Boyd et al
| Dangelo Lewis |
| Marty Boyd and Arkansas, State of |
| 3:2021cv00251 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| D P Marshall |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Lewis' petition is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/21/2022. (jak) |
Filing 4
ORDER adopting #2 recommendation. Lewis' 2241 petition will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/21/2022. (jak)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Petition. CORRECTION: The original document was attached to the docket in error (missing judge initials) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added as an attachment to #1 docket entry and is attached hereto for service/review by the parties. (cmn) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED, and that the case be DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/15/2021. (lmc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Dangelo Lewis. (wbb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/20/2021: #1 Main Document - Correct) (cmn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
