Gilmore v. ARcare Inc
Alicia Gilmore |
ARcare Inc |
3:2022cv00123 |
May 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Brian S Miller |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 11 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to #10 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Brian S. Miller. (jak) |
![]() |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by ARcare Inc (Bates, Laura) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by ARcare Inc (Bates, Laura) |
Filing 7 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court notifying party that #6 Notice lacks an attorney's address, telephone number, Bar number, and email address (General Order 53) and lacks a correct case number (Local Rule 5.5(a)). (jak) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Alicia Gilmore re #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel --Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel and Liaison Counsel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g)(3) with Incorporated Brief in Support --Plaintiff's Supplement to Motion to Appoint Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel and Liaison Counsel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g)(3) (Sanford, Joshua) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/23/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct (submitted 5/23/2022)) (jak). |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Joseph M. Lyon. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4271524. Filed by Alicia Gilmore (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel --Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel and Liaison Counsel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g)(3) with Incorporated Brief in Support by Alicia Gilmore (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Biography of Chestnut Cambronne, #2 Exhibit B - Biography of Attorney Jean Sutton Martin, #3 Exhibit C - Biography of Morgan & Morgan Attorneys)(Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Cases --Joint Motion to Consolidate with Incorporated Brief in Support by Alicia Gilmore (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case by Alicia Gilmore; Case Number 3:22-cv-117. (ldb) |
Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Alicia Gilmore against ARcare Inc. (Fee $ 402, Receipt Number LIT086824.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gilmore v. ARcare Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alicia Gilmore | |
Represented By: | Joseph M. Lyon |
Represented By: | Joshua Sanford |
Represented By: | Terence R. Coates |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ARcare Inc | |
Represented By: | Laura E. Bates |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.