Anderson v. Davison et al
Plaintiff: Clarence Anderson
Defendant: Davison, Tyler Robinson, Cagel and Ron Hunter
Case Number: 3:2022cv00160
Filed: July 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: J Thomas Ray
Referring Judge: Billy Roy Wilson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Clarence Anderson. (jak)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 IFP application. Anderson's custodian is directed to collect monthly payments from his institutional account and forward them to the Clerk of Court until a total of $350 has been paid. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Jail Administrator for the Poinsett County Detention Center. Service of the complaint is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 7/22/2022. (jak)
July 20, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clarence Anderson. (ldb)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS. Denying as incomplete #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, they must within 30 days of this Order either pay the $402 filing fee in full or file a properly completed IFP motion, along with a properly completed prison trust fund account statement and calculation sheet. The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff an IFP application along with a copy of this Order. Detention officials are directed to assist you in completing the necessary forms. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 7/7/2022. (jak)
July 1, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Clarence Anderson. (ldb)
July 1, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clarence Anderson. (ldb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Davison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clarence Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyler Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cagel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?