Cook v. Gibbons, et al
Case Number: 4:2004cv00073
Filed: January 27, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Little Rock Office
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Presiding Judge: H. David Young
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 282 ORDER adopting 280 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Winters' 274 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and his 279 Motion for Facts to be Deemed Admitted is denied; judgment will be entered for all Defts, dismissing Pltf's complaint with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/26/09. (vjt)
May 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 280 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Winters' motion for facts to be deemed admitted should be denied because it makes no difference in the final resolution of this proceeding 279 . The motion for summary judgment should be granted 274 . Pltf's complt should be dismissed with prejudice as to all of the defts and judgment should be entered for all of the defts. Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 5/4/2009. (lej)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Gibbons, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?