Bumgardner v. Benton, City of et al
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Doyle Bumgardner, Jr
Defendant:
Benton, City of, Benton Police Department, Gary Sipes, Daniel Creasey and David Richey
Case Number:
4:2008cv00202
Filed:
March 14, 2008
Court:
Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office:
Little Rock Office
County:
Jefferson
Presiding Judge:
Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit:
Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| December 29, 2008 | 46 |
ORDER adopting 43 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, Defts' 30 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/29/08. (vjt)
|
| December 10, 2008 | 43 |
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the defts are entitled to judgment as a matter of law and their motion for summary judgment be granted 30 . Objections to R&R due by 12/24/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 12/10/2008. (lej)
|
| October 22, 2008 | 35 |
ORDER denying 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 34 plaintiff until November 24, 2008 in which to reply to defts motion for summary judgment 34 30 . Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 10/22/08. (bkp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
