Roberson v. Corey et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 10, 2008
ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting 3 Report and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to the three strikes rule se t forth in 28 USC 1915(g); Pltf may pay the statutory filing fee of $350, in full, and file a Motion to Reopen this case, within thirty days of the entry of this Order; the Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3), that an ifp appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/10/08. (mkf)
|November 13, 2008
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending 1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied; recommending this § 1983 action be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); recommending Plaintiff be given the opportunity to continue this case by: (a) paying the statutory filing fee of $350, in full, noting the above case style and number; and (b) filing a Motion to Reopen the case; and rec ommending the Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order and Judgment adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 11/28/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/13/08. (hph)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?