Regency Hospital of Northwest Arkansas LLC v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Arkansas Eastern District Regency Hospital of Northwest Arkansas LLC v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Regency Hospital of Northwest Arkansas LLC v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Plaintiff:	Regency Hospital of Northwest Arkansas LLC
Defendant:	Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Case Number:	4:2008cv04177
Filed:	November 24, 2008
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	G. Thomas Eisele
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1441 Petition for Removal-ERISA

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 5, 2010	Filing 44 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 30 Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 36 Plaintiff Regency Hospital Company's Motion for Summary Judgment; and directing Plaintiff Regency Hospital Company's counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for filing the Amended Complaint by filing a brief with the Court by 8/20/10. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 8/5/10. (hph)
December 21, 2009	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Defendant Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield's Motion to Dismiss, or alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment. The Amended Complaint, if any, must be filed not later than 1/7/10. If no Amended Complaint is filed by that date, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this case. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 12/21/09. (hph)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 5, 2010

Filing 44 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 30 Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 36 Plaintiff Regency Hospital Company's Motion for Summary Judgment; and directing Plaintiff Regency Hospital Company's counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for filing the Amended Complaint by filing a brief with the Court by 8/20/10. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 8/5/10. (hph)

December 21, 2009

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Defendant Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield's Motion to Dismiss, or alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment. The Amended Complaint, if any, must be filed not later than 1/7/10. If no Amended Complaint is filed by that date, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this case. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 12/21/09. (hph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regency Hospital of Northwest Arkansas LLC v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regency Hospital of Northwest Arkansas LLC
Represented By:	Timothy James Cullen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Represented By:	Allan W. Horne
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?