Williams v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| Marcovous L Williams |
| Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry Norris, Robert A Parker, Kay Howell, Roger Cameron, Kerry Bakken and Sharon McGlothin |
| 4:2009cv00111 |
| February 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER setting status conference with Williams and counsel on Tuesday, June 26, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom B-155, Richard S. Arnold U.S. Courthouse in Little Rock. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/14/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying pltf's 50 Motion to Compel; granting pltf's 54 Motion for Extension of Time until 2/5/11 to respond to defts' 47 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/20/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting pltf's 16 MOTION for Continuance of Bench Trial scheduled for 4/12/10; a new trial date will be set by separate Order if necessary; pltf's motion is denied regarding leave to file an amended complaint and for appointment of counsel; deft is directed to file a brief within 15 days from the entry of this Order on the issue of whether the complaint states an actionable claim; pltf will have 15 days thereafter to file a response. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/1/10. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
