Illig v. Department of Defense

Plaintiff: Keith Illig
Defendant: Department of Defense
Case Number: 4:2009cv00143
Filed: February 27, 2009
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 05:0701 Maritime Subsidy Board

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 3, 2009 17 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER granting Deft's 5 MOTION to Dismiss; Pltf's 16 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED as moot; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/3/09. (vjt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Illig v. Department of Defense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Illig
Represented By: Thomas S. Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Defense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?