Meagley v. Little Rock, City of

Plaintiff: Terri Meagley
Defendant: Little Rock, City of
Case Number: 4:2009cv00226
Filed: March 20, 2009
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 13, 2010 61 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of Little Rock, City of against Terri Meagley re 60 Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/13/10. (bkp)
April 20, 2010 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 4/19/10. (bkp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meagley v. Little Rock, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terri Meagley
Represented By: Luther Oneal Sutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Little Rock, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?