Jackson v. Paslidis et al
| Tom Jackson |
| Nick Paslidis, Donna Soodalter-Toman and Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care |
| USA |
| 4:2009cv00812 |
| October 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER DISMISSING CASE having been notified that a settlement has been reached. The Court retains complete jurisdiction for 30 days to vacate this order and to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/3/2012. (pag)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss; granting 46 Motion to Amend; Jackson must file his second amended complaint within 7 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/3/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Unseal the Record; granting 27 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to the Amended Complaint; defts must file their answer to the amended complaint within ten days from the entry of this Order; granting 34 Motion to Extend Time; Jackson has up to and including 1/19/12 to serve the individual defts. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/14/11. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
