Womack v. Bell et al
Plaintiff: Curly Lee Womack
Defendant: J Bell, Doc Holladay, Berry and Hobbs
Case Number: 4:2010cv00533
Filed: June 1, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall Jr.
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT : Consistent with the Order of Dismissal that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely and p roperly comply with the Court's 3/18/11 Order. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order of Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 4/21/11. (hph)
March 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER directing the Clerk to send to plaintiff a freeworld application to proceed ifp and directing the plaintiff to file, within 30 days of the entry of this Order, a statement indicating whether he would like to proceed with this action; and a properly completed Application to Proceed ifp. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 3/18/11. (kpr)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Ray's proposed findings and partial recommended disposition; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Defendant Bell and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, complaint, amended complaint, and this Order upon Bell without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor; dismissing all other claims and Defendants without prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/22/10. (hph)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Womack v. Bell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curly Lee Womack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doc Holladay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Berry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?