Falcon v. CEMCO Inc et al
Darrin Falcon |
CEMCO Inc, Manchester Tank & Equipment Company, Doe Corporation and John Does |
4:2010cv00715 |
June 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Pulaski |
D. P. Marshall |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 174 JUDGMENT dismissing all claims and cross-claims with prejudice pursuant to the parties' settlements 172 170 . Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/3/13. (kpr) |
Filing 169 ORDER scheduling a status conference on April 18, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., if indemnity is not resolved before then. A joint motion to dismiss would be appreciated by the Court. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/14/13. (kpr) |
Filing 155 ORDER amending and supplementing the 153 Scheduling Order. Motions in limine now due 6/3/13; responses due 6/12/13; replies due 6/18/13. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/12/12. (kpr) |
Filing 126 ORDER granting 123 125 Motions to Dismiss Party and dismissing all claims and cross-claims by and against deft YoungDo without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/3/11. (kpr) |
Filing 75 ORDER denying as moot 61 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 62 Motion for Relief; denying as moot 69 Motion to Stay; granting 73 Motion to Approve/Approval, as amended. Falcon's oral motion for leave to amend is also granted. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/8/11. (kpr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.