Kilpatrick v. Advantage Sales & Marketing

Plaintiff: Lisa Kilpatrick
Defendant: Advantage Sales & Marketing
Case Number: 4:2010cv00725
Filed: June 23, 2010
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Crittenden
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 5, 2011 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to settlement. The jury trial scheduled for May 23, 2011 is canceled and the pending motion is moot. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 4/5/11. (kpr)
December 13, 2010 15 Opinion or Order of the Court PROTECTIVE ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation and Agreement. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/13/10. (bkp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kilpatrick v. Advantage Sales & Marketing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Kilpatrick
Represented By: Lucien Ramseur Gillham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advantage Sales & Marketing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?