Campbell v. Stout et al
| Shalonda Campbell |
| Carl Stout, Mark Culbertson, Richard Spades, Michelle Glover, Sinclair, Winburn, David Langley, Lynn McCallister, Jennifer Newton, Brooke Brown, Denese Voss, Dallas Steward, Kelly Riggs and Scenerio LaFendo |
| 4:2010cv01090 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT pursuant to 28 Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this action with prejudice; the Court certifies that an ifp appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/19/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; that dismissal of this action constitute a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915( g); that the Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith; objections must be received no later than 14 dates from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/4/2010. (jas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
