Bell v. USA et al
| Megyn Elizabeth Bell |
| USA and Willis D Cronkhite, III |
| 4:2010cv01641 |
| November 10, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2410 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER consolidating this case with 4:11-cv-63, with this case being the lead case. All future filings should be styled as in this Order but filed only in the lead case. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/16/11. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Stay pending a decision by a state court in related litigation. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/7/11. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Defendant Cronkhite's motion to interplead. To the extent that Cronkhite has already paid out $55,844.52 into the registry of the state court, those funds will be transferred to this court 9;s registry and held in an interest-bearing account pending the outcome of this litigation. Cronkhite's request to be preemptively discharged from any further liability in connection with the Trust is denied, and he shall remain a defendant in this action and is directed to provide an update on the status of the accounting ordered by the state court in January 2010. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/23/2010. (thd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
