Brown v. Blackstock et al
Ricky Brown |
Givens, Blackstock and Ira Furlow |
4:2011cv00291 |
April 4, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Faulkner |
D. P. Marshall |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 JUDGMENT: Brown's 2 Complaint is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties' settlement. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/3/2012. (dmn) |
Filing 39 ORDER denying 38 Defendants' Motion to Stay. Defendants must file within 30 days either a Joint Motion to Dismiss or a Motion for an Exention of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 01/06/2012. (kcs) |
Filing 12 ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Ray's Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition. Brown may proceed with his excessive-force claims against Blackstock, Givens, and Doe in their individual capacities. All other claims and defendants ar e dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); granting 9 Brown's motion for service; identifying Ira Furlow as John Doe; directing the Clerk to issue the summons and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summonses and complaint on Defendants Blackstock, Givens, and Furlow without prepayment of fees, costs, or security. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/9/11. (hph) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.